Tag: digital

  • Luminar Neo’s new portrait background removal

    Luminar Neo’s new portrait background removal

    Luminar Neo has gained a new tool – Portrait Background Removal, enabling the background behind a subject to be made transparent in one click. Careful hair-by-hair selections are done by trained neural networks.

    Portrait Background Removal tool can be found in the Luminar Neo Layer masking options. 

    It offfers:

    • Remove Background without Layering. Just open Luminar Neo, load an image, and select Portrait Background Removal.
    • Get clean assets for composing. Any portrait you edit can be exported as a PNG with a transparent background, a great base for seamless photo composing.
    • Create realistic portraits with AI that’s precisely trained on people. AI scans the image to find and select human figures as accurately as possible. Luminar Neo has an option to edit several images in a click with custom saved Presets, so editing event portraits becomes faster.
    • Achieve precise selections without extreme effort. The portrait and the background are highlighted in different colours. A Transition Brush refines the edges by removing unnecessary elements where the portrait and background touch. The Object Brush revives portrait details that may have been eliminated by the neural network, while the Background Brush helps to additionally remove parts that aren’t detected by the AI. 

    Luminar Neo is available as a one-time purchase or as a subscription. The new architecture is flexible, so it can be easily updated in the future. Luminar Neo is available in both the Microsoft Store and the macOS App Store. Luminar Neo works as a plugin, so you can keep your images in your preferred photo editor while still benefiting from its powerful AI tools.

    Additionally, the brand-new Luminar Share mobile app allows you to quickly and seamlessly transfer images from your phone to your computer. Take a photo, edit it, and post it to social media without third-party programs that reduce quality. Luminar Share is available on the Google Play Store and the macOS App Store.​​

    To learn more about Luminar Neo and sign up for updates, visit http://skylum.com/luminar-neo

  • Larmor 5th Generation glass screen protector with Sunshade

    We’ve fitted GGS or similar toughened laminated glass screen protectors to our Sony bodies ever since way back in 2011, we were the first Alpha web resource to publish information about NEX screen delamination and how to repair a deteriorated LCD using one of these great products.

    Replacing NEX LCD Cover Glass

    Of course it wasn’t a cover glass, just a plastic surface layer. But if you fit a GGS, Larmor or similar ultrathin glass protector the moment you get your new Sony Alpha body (whether mirrorless or SLT, compact or bridge) you don’t need to mess with the original, risk your warranty, or risk anything at all. The new Generation 5 Larmor has a silicon adhesive which clings instantly, bubble-free, yet peels off safely using just a fingernail under a corner. It permits all touch screen operations, all screen folding including A99/77 and RX10 series reverse foldaway, and for around £10/$15 is an essential for your new camera.

    Now there’s a new version which comes with a magnetic black surround and accepts a folding screen shade which just pops on to this. We paid £15.95 from ukhighland photographic on eBay, post free, VAT receipt given.

    (more…)
  • Sony A7RIII – more than a skin deep upgrade

    With a body-only price of £3,199/$3,198, the third generation of the A7R came as a surprise to Sony’s own photo studio, who labelled most of the product pictures release on Wednesday as ‘A7RM2’ instead of ‘A7RIII’. We’ve changed the filenames on our system, but countless mediafolk of the future will be confused. They do after all look similar.

    In fact the new 24-105mm f/4 G OSS lens was released with pictures of it on the A7RIII, above, and also on the A9 below. With the A7RIII having a 10fps 42 megapixel motordrive capability, thanks to an improved LSI and new processing engine reading off much faster from the 42 megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor, you might have expected economies of scale to have given it the same Dynax 7D-like left hand end drive mode physical dial like the A9, below – especially as the A7RIII has an additional drive-type mode, a four-shot sensor shift to capture 169 megapixels of image data.

    This involves shifting by one pixel in four positions, and does not create a 4X size, 2X linear pixel count file. You can only get that by shifting half a pixel as Olympus do. The Pentax sensor shift high-res mode shifts by one pixel, and it does not increase the image dimensions, only the sharpness and colour information for each pixel location (making the image similar to a Sigma dp Quattro file in fine detail resolution). The Sony implementation also appears to need almost half a second between each of the four subframes, requiring a tripod and roughly 2 seconds of capture time. Sony’s proven multishot processing will certainly be able to remove any problems with movement of parts of the subject during this time, but it has to be done in the computer, using the new software suite.

    Some commentators have assumed that the 169 megapixel four-shot file means large dimensions, effectively a 169 megapixel resolution full frame, the same way Olympus gets high megapixel files. But the pre-release information clearly indicates it’s a Pentax-type mode – here’s from the wording provided to dealers by Sony:

    “You can then stitch the images together to create an image with fewer artifacts and a truer range of colours”.

    I tested that on the Pentax K-1 and concluded it was not worth the effort. Regular normal 42 megapixel AA-free shots on a top grade lens are all you need. I’ll repeat that bit about top grade lens.

    The A7RIII also has a new shutter mechanism which reduces shock, improving the SteadyShot performance, though still 30s to 1/8,000s as before. The sensor gains a new anti-reflective coating and there will be many ‘under the hood’ improvements because that’s what happens. There may also be teething troubles and newly introduced problems, because that also happens. However I’d say early buyers run less risk with this third generation A7R than they did with the predecessors, or indeed with the A6500.

    But we’ll leave you with the 9 for comparison. Most else that matters is the same, like for example the Memory registers – only two on the A7RII, but three on the A7RIII. It will remember more things, like Setting Effect OFF/ON, and that is just as well because the III puts a DSLR-like feature on its left hand end, a threaded coaxial Prontor-Compur (PC) flash synchronisation terminal (below). Let’s just hope that the circuitry inside is well isolated, as one of my vintage flash units destroyed the Godox X1-T which I use both to get Setting Effect OFF and isolation from high trigger voltages on my A7RII.

    Study this left end for a bit. It does have phantom power for the 2.5mm mic jack, but the earphone output has been moved so that two doors must now be opened at once to use both together. And there’s something missing.

    The A7RII has a screw socket next to the neatly paired mic/headphone jacks, which allows a custom made tether clamp assembly (supplied with the camera, seen above) to hold HDMI and USB cables with clamped protection looping. You’ll need some extra Tether Tools kit to safeguard the connectors on the MkIII. There is now a USB-C/3 Super Speed connector as well as a USB-Micro Multifunction, and Micro HDMI. But no provided security of a tether clamp.

    The back of the camera has much the same screen, but with improvements to resolution and daylight visibility – still no twist and turn, or reversing to face the camera back and protect the LCD. The rear button layout is revised, with movie button located near the viewfinder (well, if Canon does it, it can’t be wrong, can it?) and the switching AF/AE Lock/Toggle/Hold button replaced by an AF-ON and separate AEL, with C3 moved to the left end. Where the movie button used to be you’ll notice a catch for the weathersealed door which covers TWO SD card slots, one UHS-II enabled (more broken bits of card contact septum to lose inside your slot!). Changes to the movie mode using the main shutter release make the use of the red button less essential.

    You can assign those cards the usual ways, to make copies on card 2 of card 1 as you shoot, just in case one fails (the most important use for wedding photographers) and also to use sequentially (overflow into card 2, liked by action photographers), or split RAW and JPEG, or still and video.

    This is the new lens, 24-105mm f/4, and it will probably be very good. It has 77mm filters so I think I’ll stick with the A6500 for travelling, as the little CZ 16-70mm f/4 which is the direct equivalent of this is tiny by comparison and uses neat 55mm filters. Despite some reports to the contrary, I’ve found it to be a good lens, sharp across the frame at 70mm wide open, though prone to flare.

    The top shows that the strictly amateur ‘SCENE’ position of the mode dial has been replaced by S&Q. I look forward to finding out what this means – probably much the same*  *Gary Friedman has provided the answer in Comments – it’s a slo-mo/fast-mo video mode which is of no interest to me personally, but might fascinate messers around with short video clips for YouTube, even if their smartphones do it better. Green auto survives, as not all owners will be experienced photographers, some will just be wealthy camera buyers and this setting will be where they leave it.

    The published specs were vague about Bluetooth, used for GPS tagging from a smartphone – I’m told US Sony Store specifications clearly state it does have. The A6500 and A9 both do, and can therefore use the Sony mobile phone function for live geotagging of pictures as you take them, using information read at the moment of capture from your nearby smartphone. We’ve also seen reports saying the A7RIII does not use Apps but that seems very unlikely.

    There are also improvements claimed for dynamic range, with the figure of 15 stops mentioned. This would actually need a 16-bit A to D conversion internally followed by compression to a virtual 15-bit range (via a tone curve) saved in the 14-bit uncompressed raw .ARW format. A 14-bit raw format is now offered for all shooting modes including high speed continuous, which on the A7RII means automatic stepdown to 12-bit. The ISO range is extended to 32,000 before Hi expansion up to 104,200 and goes down to 100 native with Lo down to 50. One benefit of an effective 15-stop range will be that ISO 50 should have 14 stops, or as much highlight data as ISO 100 on the MkII.

    The extra effective bit depth also pays off when using the S-Log3 and Hybrid-Gamma HDR video settings. This brings Sony professional video camera standards into a primarily still camera for the first time (better than the video-targeted A7SII, and the A9).

    Sony claim improved skin tones too, though compared to what is a bit of a worry. Many people like Canon skin tones, I think they are like a 1970s USA colour portrait and that Sony’s skin colours have always been more natural. Others disagree and want the pinker, less yellow, face tones.

    The A7RIII uses the new larger battery with its 2.7X capacity, introduced in the A9. I rather like the way my current Sony cameras share one rather underpowered battery type, but at least a bagful of batteries covers A56500, A7RII, RX10. There are not many different battery types, as we could find with our Olympus kit (check E-M1, E-M1 MkII, E-M5, E-M5MkII, E-M10, E-M10MkII and E-M10MkIII batteries if you want a nightmare). You can also charge Sony batteries in-camera.

    Will I buy it? Probably not. I use the A7RII for relatively static, large image size, low ISO, controlled shooting of landscapes, architecture, products and so on. I have sold my full frame zooms except for the 70-300mm G OSS and now only use primes on the A7RII (10mm, 18mm, 28mm, 50mm macro, 55mm, 85mm). I don’t travel with it. We’ve bought an Olympus OM-D E-M1 MkII for its Pro Capture (60fps, 18-20fps with pre-shot buffering) and macro auto focus stacking. I’m sticking with the A6500 kit for travel (10-18mm, 16-70mm, 55-210mm) but it’s got to go head to head with the Olympus including the use of the two different smartphone GPS methods.

    • David Kilpatrick

    WEX Pre-Order (Affiliate link) UK £3199

    MPB (Affiliate link) – buy and sell used Sony equipment UK

    B&H (Affiliate link) – order US/World from $3198

  • Alpha A9 promises professional performance

    You can order the A9 here – any of these links to order will help photoclubalpha pay our way.

    B&H have it listed 

    WEX in the UK (also Calumet)

    Amazon (co.uk)

    The front view below of the Sony Alpha A9 body, introduced today, gives a subtle clue about changes under the hood. For some time we’ve been nagging Sony about the weak, potentially tilting, 4-screw mount on the mirrorless bodies. Now they have at least added two more screws, to match Fujifilm X or the A-mount, even if the distribution is a bit odd with all the extra strength concentrated at the sides not the top and bottom where heavy lenses normally cause most stress.

    It’s a clue to a different internal construction, probably stronger all round, to make it possible to support the new 100-400mm G Master  lens, a native E-mount new design which should come as a relief to those struggling with the A-mount 70-400mm varieties on adaptors:

    But the lenses still have four-screw mount fitting (as do most A-mount lenses), and fairly weak sacrificial assemblies to prevent damage to the camera if knocked. See this video (it’s a bit long but makes a point): //www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGvlX9BtiTQ

    The EVF of the A9 is around twice as bright as the A7RII and also runs at twice the refresh rate, while offering 50% more pixels. Part of this is down to the new stacked-CMOS 24.2 megapixel full frame sensor, which has a readout some twenty times faster than the A7II and previous generation 24 megapixel models. That, of course, is linked to the 6K native live feed from the full frame (used to create very high quality 4K video as well as an excellent live view) which in turn enables a distortion-free purely electronic silent shutter running to 1/32,000s plus 20 frames per second sequence shooting.

    AF is claimed to be 25% faster than the A7RII and when the shutter speed is faster than 1/125s there is no visible blackout in the finder when shooting. Personally, a single frame (1/120s or 1/60s) blip would never be unwelcome as it helps tell you when you’ve shot. As for the low-light capability, not too much is being said; it’s in the usual up to 56,200 range with extension of two more stops. (Edit: April 20, we have noticed that at least one ‘reviewer’ – Sony Artisan paid to promote – completely wrongly claims 2,048,000 ISO not the actual 204,800, when comparing the A9 with the Nikon D5’s listed 3,276,800). The high speed sequences, movie frame rate and EVF refresh all tend to limit ultimate low-light clean imaging and we would guess that the A7SII and A7RII will not be made redundant.

    That can not be said for the old weeny weedy weaky batteries of the E-mount range. The stripling NP-FW50 used in all the NEX to A7 series models gets kicked aside by a slightly larger variant with 2.2X the capacity. Frankly, it’s overdue but it creates a split system. I’m happy to travel with my A6000, RX10, and A7RII all sharing a pool of batteries even if those do run down alarmingly fast.

    If it means carrying a new dual charger too, to get the necessary 2.5 hour recharge time instead of a leisurely overnight in-camera top up, I can only hope the charger (cum mains adaptor with clumsy dummy battery connection) also accepts the older batteries. It’s carrying multiple chargers that increases my travel bag weight not carrying extra batteries.

    But… I see that the charger ‘cradle’ can mount four of the new cells, and charge the lot in 480 minutes. This cradle has a dummy battery on a lead, and 1/4″ tripod thread mounting points to add it to a video rig (which this camera is not specially made for, indicating an A9S is on the way with S-Log and direct 4K top quality encoding). The dummy battery then powers the camera for roughly 10X the life of the current A7 series batteries. So what if you have an A7 model? Easy – the outer shell of the battery simply slides off, revealing a SMALLER dummy inside, which fits the entire NEX/A7 mirrorless range or indeed the RX10 series. So your existing Sony mirrorless kit can be powered using this ‘battery bank’.

    The top plate reveals that some input has been listen to. As a regular M1-M2-M3 user on my A99, the drop to only two memory registers on the A7RII is unwelcome but survivable. A return to three, plus a a custom button memory recall function, will make the a9 better. Having the drive modes on a physical control is good too. But I’ll leave any verdict on all this until the actual operation is better known – whether, for example, the memory registers now cover more than just the primary camera settings and thus enable one-step tripod setup.

    I’ll have to say that after using the Olympus OM-D E-M1 MkII, which offers many of the advantages being claimed by the A9 as major selling points, the non-reversible simple tilt rear screen remains a negative compared to a fully articulated reversible screen. Sony does now offer a real glass protector, but I like the A55 to A99 style screen which can be turned to face the wall permanently if you want (and has never arrived on the E-mount models).

    The new joystick controller takes something from the A99/II controls and adds it to the wheel of the A7 series, while the upper thumb button becomes a native back-button AF. In addition to being able to move the focus points faster (it’s a pain with the A7RII design) there is a memory for AF point selection and a horizontal-vertical switch function. Combined with a larger number of AF points covering 93% of the sensor, the action/sports performance of the A9 should be a long way ahead of any earlier mirrorless (though the A6500 is pretty good).

    Though not visible here, there are two SDXC (one UHS-II) card slots with the usual recording options similar to the A99/II, and also an Ethernet port which is almost a requirement for some major sports events. You will notice that the Drive control has a Focus control below it, giving direct access to the kind of AF/MF/DMF choices found on the dedicated controller of A-mount bodies – no more need for menu or Function/Custom button operations.

    The eyepiece, shown here, may perhaps be a little less prone to detachment and we are promised the least squiffy finder view with new optics.

    There is one minor fly in the ointment, a price-tag of £4,500 (UK) body only; the 100-400mm will be £2,500. While the team of assembled ambassadors made much of praising the silent shutter mode and small size of the camera at Sony’s vidcast press conference, none of this is new and pretty much anything the A9 can do is also within the reach of the A7RII and A7SII even if it does it faster and perhaps better. There was some praise for the durability of the system – what? I don’t know about others, but I find the Sony/Zeiss lenses are the worst I’ve ever owned for showing almost immediate signs of wear from the lightest contact with clothing and bags. Silver appears through the molecule-thin black coating instantly and neither the regular lenses nor the bodies have ever struck me as being suitable to knock around in a busy press kit or travel bag. Where old Leicas survived years of abuse elegantly, gradually brassing at the edges, my Sony kit generally just looks a bit scruffy and used despite minimal handling. The A9 looks about the same in this respect as the mark II lesser models.

    Full official press information and specifications can be seen here:

    //presscentre.sony.co.uk/pressreleases/sonys-new-a9-camera-revolutionises-the-professional-imaging-market-1923969

    And for the lens:

    //presscentre.sony.co.uk/pressreleases/sony-expands-flagship-g-master-lens-series-with-new-100-400mm-super-telephoto-e-mount-zoom-1923976

    • David Kilpatrick

     

     

  • Is retouching acceptable?

    There’s been a controversy surrounding Steve McCurry, a photographer I have listened to on the edge of a conversation a couple of times courtesy of Kodak who were always great sponsors and put his ‘Afghan Girl’ on display at photokina 2012 where McCurry’s work was celebrated.

    Here’s the story – he’s been changing, or allowing his retouchers and agents to change, the material content of some shots. This has included the removal of people, changes to their clothing, tidying up messy objects and distractions. First, this is not something new and great photojournalists never saw harm in burning in or dodging back areas of a print to make something disappear into a shadow or burn out to white. It was OK to use bleach on prints if needed to remove blemishes, including things which damaged the shot. It was even OK to use tints or pencil to enhance outlines so that newspaper reproduction didn’t lose the subject in a grey mush.

    http://petapixel.com/2016/06/07/eyes-afghan-girl-critical-take-steve-mccurry-scandal/

    That’s the current controversy.

    Well, here are some examples from my archives. One dates from 1969 and back when the first prints were made from this, with publication in The Guardian and various magazines, I used pencil and bleach to try to ensure the faces at the centre of the group were properly defined from the wall behind them. This was a very mild treatment and not very successful.

    Here’s a not-totally straight print. Some detailed dodging and burning was done in the darkroom to try to get the definition needed between the blonde girl’s face and the wall. It was this lack of definition which meant it was never a real winner, though it did well enough in competitions. It was also taken on outdated Perutz film using a very cheap manual Hanimex lens – I was only 17 and could not afford anything more!

    Vintage 1969 black and white print scan secondary school pupils crowd round a little black girl who has fallen and is crying at Maltby Grammar School sports day. Note the black child was one of twins from the only coloured family in this Yorkshire mining town and at this time there was no discrimination just a lot of attention.

    Once scanned, the print could be retouched digitally, Photoshop giving much more accurate control of burning-in the tone of the wall behind the girls. This is the result – it’s not a huge change. and I do not think anyone would suggest it falsifies the image.

    Vintage 1969 black and white print scan secondary school pupils crowd round a little black girl who has fallen and is crying at Maltby Grammar School sports day. Note the black child was one of twins from the only coloured family in this Yorkshire mining town and at this time there was no discrimination just a lot of attention.

    Moving on, here’s another group of children – three kids in the timed-burst water play fountain at Alnwick Castle Garden. It’s a picture I was very pleased to catch, the best of three frames with the children at the best critical moment for action and composition. But in the darkroom I would certainly have burned in the people in the background to reduce their distracting highlights.

    Children run into a fountain released by build up of a head of water visible in a tube popular water feature in Alnwick Garden Northumberland UK

    One of the principles of making a picture which works is to reduce it to a simple form. Extra faces always distract (we are drawn to look at faces regardless of composition). So, for this image, I retouched our the entire background scene. This would not be allowed by many competition, awards and some news or general media.

    Children run into a fountain released by build up of a head of water visible in a tube popular water feature in Alnwick Garden Northumberland UK

    Since I offer both images as licensable stock, with the retouched version clearly identified as retouched, I don’t feel there is any wrongdoing here.

    The next example is less controversial because it has no people at all. Wires interfere with the view of Hollows Tower, the old stronghold of the reiver Johnny Armstrong in the debateable lands as you pass from Scotland into England.

    Hollows, the tower house of the Armstrong clan lairds of Gilnockie on the border between England and Scotland. Unretouched see also version with power lines removed from shot.

    It’s not a massive task to remove the pole and wire mess. It falsifies the state of the scene, but only from a viewpoint which is not typical – most tourists see the tower as they drive past, from many angles.

    Hollows, the tower house of the Armstrong clan lairds of Gilnockie on the border between England and Scotland. Retouched image with power lines removed.

    I have not removed all the poles!

    Finally, another example of where the infrastructure spoils the scene. In Holetown, Barbados, local ladies tend to dress up well to do the shopping and tend to stop to chat in the street. Even so, it’s a matter of framing and shooting quickly to catch a neat moment before they move on or something else gets in the way. And the wiring on the wall really does spoil the shot.

    Barbados Holetown St Thomas parish west coast two Bajan ladies typically dressed chat on a street corner

    The retouching here was more complex. Is it a crime, or a routine part of modern photography?

    Barbados Holetown St Thomas parish west coast two Bajan ladies typically dressed chat on a street corner retouched version

    My work is generally used by travel guides, or in articles and books relating to people and places, travel and everyday life. The meter on the wall clearly documents the real place. The retouched image is an imaginary place. However it’s not been removed because it was an ugly meter. It’s removed because it spoiled a shot which I liked.

    You can make your own judgments on Steve McCurry or his retouchers. Did they alter the pictures because they were really spoiled by the way they were? I feel I would have been happy with the unretouched image in most cases or used less obvious major changes.

    – David Kilpatrick

     

  • Sony A7R II, RX10 II, RX100 IV – making everything else obsolete

    (Updated June 15th after press conference)

    sonyjune1528

    The new Sony A7R II is the camera I’ve been waiting for, which everyone has predicted, and which seems to tick every box without having a huge price label on its own. I find the $3,200 (UK coinfirmed £2,600) matches its stated specifications well. Others may disagree, but they’re probably influenced by the price collapse of the original A7R, now occasionally found for under £1k.

    sonyjune1526

    Even so, at $3,200 the A7R II commands a $1,500 premium over the A7 II and much of that must be what you pay the new sensor – which does not seem to be licensed or sold to any other brand. Not even to Nikon, yet. The A7S remains the most expensive model despite the minimal 12 megapixel capture and lack of in-body stabilisation (SS in Sony terms, or IBIS generically).

    On Monday June 15th I flew to London to have a look at the A7R II and the new RX10 II (£1,200) and RX100 IV (£850). This was a bit like a motoring journalist going to a car launch and being told, you can sit in the seat, waggle the gearstick but don’t start the engine as no photography was allowed with any of the demonstraton cameras. I was surprised to find it was a European conference, as this normally means journalists from across the Channel have a facility trip to be present, and that seems very extravagant just to look at cameras which can not be tried out. I wish I lived in France not Scotland – it might not have cost me almost £300 to be there, eight miles from Heathrow (but an eight miles which might as well be a fifty Scots miles!).

    Don’t expect to get one on June 17th, as B&H’s information and too many bloggers have repeated. We are told by B&H it won’t arrive until August even though pre-orders open on June 17th in the USA. It may be later arriving in some regions. Demand is going to be so high that if you want one, you’ll need to crash into that queue…

    But you can snag a Canon EOS 5DS – 50 megapixels – for only $3,699 right now

    A7R II – or A7 II R?

    In brief, the A7R II consists of an A7 II body with a new 42.4 megapixel backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, same Bionz X processor allowing 5fps at full resolution, new 399-point Phase Detection AF on the sensor covering most of the field (up from 117 points), a similar EVF with improved eyepiece giving a genuinely impressive 0.78X instead of 0.71X virtual magnification, the same rearRGBW bright LCD, plus silent shutter and HD 4K movie functions improving on the offering of the A7S. The new shutter mechanism is claimed to have a 500,000 actuation life expectancy which puts it ahead of almost every pro DSLR yet made. The back of the camera body is magnesium, where it’s solid composite plastic in the A7II. And it has, unlike the A7R, five-axis sensor stabilisation which talks to Sony OSS lenses for the best blend of anti-shake methods ever devised.

    kelsokelpiesgirl12mm-evf78

    The new EVF size, to the eye – compared with the old (A7II, A7R, A7) 0.71X view below (A7R, Sigma 12-24mm at 12mm, Canon EF fit, on Commlite EF-FE adaptor).

    kelsokelpiesgirl12mm-evf71

    You will read in the specifications and promo blurb that it has a new LCD double the brightness, new tough body and strengthened mount, new shutter release and controls but all these ‘improvements’ are listed by Sony over the A7R and already existed in the A7 II. Instead of making comparisons with the A7 II – which this is really a development from – Sony has listed many advances made relative to the A7R. It is not an A7R II. It’s really an A7 II R.

    sonyjune1527

    The eyepiece surround is much improved, wider and softer still than the A7II which in turn is softer on specs then the earlier models. Eyepoint and position flexibility both improve and there are no unsharp zones at all even if you shift your eye around.

    It’s important to understand that many of the improvements already exist in the A7 II partly as a result of criticisms of the original A7R made by objective reviewers, not Sony artisans or staff or sponsored bloggers. You don’t owe this camera to the success of its predecessors or the daily Facebook sermons of awestruck evangelists – you owe its features to corrections made to the shortcomings of the models so far. And to those who have had no vested interest (other than ownership) persuading them to weaken critical appraisal. The further improvements in the A7R II are either extremely technical – serious core improvements in the sensor and focusing – or minor refinements and carries-over from the A7II.

    42.4 versus 36 point anything

    If you really think 42.4 megapixels is going to take you to realms far beyond your 36 megapixel sensor, think again. It is the same step up as from 18 megapixels to 21 megapixels, a move Canon made without absolutely transforming the images created, or about the same as from 10mp to 12mp. There’s one big difference – it does not make the jump to any larger common print or repro size. Remember going from 6 to 8? That was from sub-full-page to a decent full page resolution, for US or A-size documents at a touch under 300dpi. 24 megapixels took us to a really sharp A2, 36 megapixels takes us to a acceptable A1, and all that 42 does is to make a slightly better A1 but not 300dpi.

    icelight-cherries-36mpsize

    icelight-cherries-42mpsize

    Above you can see the actual, real size difference (in proportion) between a 36 megapixel shot and a 42 megapixel shot. If you click on the bigger version, it will take you to my pBase page with a full A7R II sized version of this A7R shot. Zeiss? No – a 45 year old Asahi Pentax Super-Multi-Coated Macro Takumar 50mm f/4, used at f/11, and a 30 second exposure at ISO 50 lit using the ICE Light 2 moved round the subject in horseshoe shaped path for 15 seconds, laid flat, and then moved under the perspex for the remaining 15.

    In practical terms, it’s 7980 x 5320 pixels (or very close – Sony has been extremely coy about releasing full specifications, even at the conference I could not find this out) versus 7360 x 4912 for the A7R. In perspective, make a big print from the A7R and it’s 24.5 inches long at optimum resolution; use the A7R II and you get one inch extra each end on the long side, 2/3rds of a inch extra top and bottom. The A7R makes a 16.3 x 24.5 inch print to perfection; the A7R II makes a 17.7 x 26.6 inch print.

    Anything smaller than A4 printed, it’s got no great advantage over the 12 megapixel A7S – but you are getting close to enabling a 2X crop (one quarter of the frame) to look as good as the A7S full frame. Sony showed A3 prints. They could, honestly, all have been shot on the Sony A100 from 2006 and no-one would have been any the wiser. One enlarged section was the only real test of the camera. I’m sure the model’s dermatologist loves it.

    a7RII-prints

    Where it does count most is when using crop frame mode. In APS-C crop mode, the A7R II file is large enough for a 300dpi double page fine art magazine spread, just under 18 megapixels. I’d say that where 42.4mp is not a critical size, 18mp actually is. You can get away with 16, and for Nikon, Panasonic, and Olympus this had been an important baseline. Cropped frame FF from Sony now rises above that baseline instead of sitting just below it.

    portlandgardens-showerroom1-11mm

    What I’d like to see would be 1:1, 4:3, 5:4 ratios implemented with the EVF and LCD screens cropped to match – and ideally the raw files reduced in size the same way. A square 1:1 would be 28 megapixels and that crop allows so many APS-C lenses (like the Zeiss Touit 12mm) to be used without vignetting or limits of coverage distortion issues. The example above is from the A7R and it’s a square crop 24 x 24mm from a frame taken with the 10-18mm f/4 Sony OSS, at 11mm; the lens would have allowed a 4:5 crop equally well.

    Important edit: just read another ‘Sony artisan’ blog post asking the (redundant) question as to whether Sony lenses will be up to this new resolution. Anyone who owns an A6000, NEX-7, or A77 is already shooting at well above this resolution (full frame will need to match the Canon 5DS 50 megapixels to beat them). The resolution of the A7R II is slightly lower than that of the base level entry A3000. Don’t panic. Plenty of old legacy lenses will match it well, let alone any new Sony FE and A-mount designs.

    I checked out the 20mm f/2.8 SEL lens with the new version 2 wide and fisheye black converters on full frame at the Sony event. Really, this lens comes so close to doing a good full frame and the converters even leave much of the area intact for a much bigger crop than APS-C.

    20mm-on-FF  20mm-wide-FF  20mm-fisheye-FF

    And that’s all without removing rear baffles or doctoring the built-in lens hoods of the converters!

    Detailed points

    When we get a chance to use the camera, the following points will be of interest:

    Has the mount been upgraded again? It still has only four attachment screws, compared to Fujfilm X system’s six screws (and the A-mount uses six too). My two camera bodies and two changes of mount on the A7R, to Tough E mount and then 2nd generation Tough E mount, all produce unpredictable degrees of slop, smoothness or jam-on tightness from various adaptors showing that no matter what, tolerances are broad. Comment: can’t tell from changing lenses at the event, it feels much the same as the A7 II.

    Has the Memory position, 1 and 2 on the mode dial, been improved to remember MORE of the important settings – notable, Setting Effect ON and OFF, for saving a studio flash preset mode with the EVF/LCD setting effect disabled? Answer: No.

    Is the hot shoe part of the Multi Function Accessory Shoe hampered by paint, or tolerances in fit, or does it readily accept all standard ISO hot shoe simple flash devices and triggers? Looks clear.

    Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM on Focus EF-FE adaptor (also works perfectly with Commlite) on A7R. The 40mm f/2.8, and Sigma 12-24mm in EF mount work well on my A7R with these two sub-Metabones price adaptors. At the press event we found the 85mm just didn’t focus at all with any adaptor on any of the pre-production A7R II bodies, but the 40mm was fine.

    Will the promised ability to use PD-on-sensor AF with Canon and other lenses rely on Metabones as the only adaptor, or is it generic? The microlenses on a backside illuminated sensor have a large effective aperture than traditional design, and this means the PD-lenses (a special variant of the microlenses used on sensel pairs) will be similarly improved. This may make some difference, but it’s actually the focus motor control via lens to body data communication which will enable fast and sure operation with Sony SSM on LA-EA3, Canon USM on EF-adaptor, and so on. Remember, this does not make screw drive or SAM, or micromotor Canon AF pre-USM lenses, function any better. It will only apply to ultrasonic, piezo, linear motor and similar finely controllable AF mechanisms with close to zero play and accurate (8 contacts, not 5) distance and ‘state’ reporting. Note, too, that Sony’s revised lenses (SSM II) are not just optical and weatherproofing reworks – the new SSM is designed to work with contrast detection, as found on the A7R, much better.

    Comment: we found that the Canon 85mm f/1.8 USMdidn’t work on any adaptor on the A7R II, while the 40mm f/2.8 activated the PDAF points and focused very rapidly, and a 24mm f/2.8 USMf/2.8 focused fast – and that various different demo A7R II bodies responded differently and one malfunctioned a lot of the time even with Metabones. Sony said this was known and the final retail stock should at least work OK with Metabones IV and probable firmware updates, but other cheaper adaptors will not be tested.

    The new camera’s mode dial has a central lock button, and a slightly lighter click action without risk of being turned by mistake. We’d had liked to have seen a lock on the +/- EV compensation dial too, but this just has slightly strengthened clicks.

    Wish list

    The same small battery has been used yet again despite the II body design having what looks like enough room for a full sized Alpha battery (see below – carefully positioned batteries with A7 II body). Let’s hope for upgraded batteries from Sony.

    Please, Sony, you provided a GPS pinout in the new shoe – you have never rolled out a GPS module or firmware. It’s three years now and no news. Hell, I nearly bought a brand new boxed A99 at Dixons Heathrow Terminal 2 shop for £1075 inc VAT maanger’s special, I miss GPS so much!

    Please let the Lens Data entered into the menu for SS of manual lenses, without data communication, be embedded into EXIF so if I enter 50mm, my files say so. And ideally, please make it possible to enter the focused distance (this would improve stabilisation) and the aperture in use (just to complete the EXIF data).

    Sony pointed out that the latest version of the lens correction App will record the focal length and aperture as you enter them, in EXIF. It has its own SS on/off setting and automatically recognises whatever focal length you have entered. You can name and recall each different lens, and if for example you normally use your 24mm f/3.5 Samyang shift lens at f/16 for architecture, you can enter f/16 as the lens’s aperture and that will be corrected embedded in your EXIF. But to get this you must run the app, not just shoot with a manually set focal length for SS.

    Please change the Memory 1 and 2 registers to save and recall ALL the camera settings and not just those in the first bank of the menu system (but see the vital point above about Setting Effect On/Off). Until I test the camera, no more to say – but Sony does not usually keep quiet about changes, and has not mentioned this aspect.

    The existing rear screen – the II design, left, improves on the original A7R but this is still a basic, amateur level screen to be working with and a fully articulated design would be better.

    Though you’ve missed the boat with this camera, the crudely hinged and angled rear screen needs to be replaced with a fully articulated screen that can be reversed to the camera for protection and to prevent distracting light when working in the dark.

    Out of the loop

    I’ve been out of reviewing new Sony gear for some time, as it has not proved possible to get hold of it early enough or for long enough to give any meaningful assessment which Joe Photographer anywhere in the world couldn’t appear to do themselves. For six or seven years I have bought and sold new Alpha gear to fill the gaps between the occasional availability of review kit, but recently that has become so expensive it exceeds any margins available from the three magazines I publish, or any fees I can obtain from other media. Like politicians, people who write about gear either need an independent mind or independent means – without one of these, you’re always in someone’s corporate pocket or feeding from crumbs under the main table.

    The result, as we see all the time, is that many early users or reviewers of Sony kit are no longer all that independent and much of the first wave of information now comes through the channel of ‘artisans’ (as it does with ‘ambassadors’ for all makes). And we see plenty of others who are clearly of independent means, whose main purpose in life is to be the first to post pictures taken with new item X regardless of the cost.

    So maybe I don’t need to push to get hold of an A7R II for the too-short two week period of any review loan, after a six month wait while other consumer-orientated magazines and blogs take priority – or indeed rush to buy one.

    But… like the RX10 which I use all the time… like the A6000 kit which is co affordable and compact it’s essential… like the RX100 MkIII which goes where even the RX10 is not welcome… like my A7 II with stabilisation which has transformed a box of assorted lenses into a solid outfit… this one’s possibly something to buy because I actually need it and will use it.

    I may not even cosy anything as it will make both the A7R and A7II redundant, because it does both jobs and also covers the A7S I did manage to borrow but never bought. And it does more.

    So, thinking whether or not to bother with this upgrade is a bit irrelevant. Even if it was still ‘just’ 36mp the other improvements would mean it still replaced the need for a handful of A7 models, all in one.

    sonyjune1534

    Small miracles

    My one doubt is that the A7R II may be beaten in practical terms by the RX10 II. Please note that so many incorrect snippets of info have gone around about the ‘stacked’ sensor design, I thought it referred to RGB stacking. It does not, the sensor is a conventional Bayer pattern, and what is stacked is the electronic substructure. This does not affect the top side of the sensor and the performance in image quality should be similar to the existing models. What it does is greatly speed data transfer and enables over 1000 (lower resolution) frames per second to be clocked through from photon received to movie frame recorded.

    The RX10 and 100 new versions offer ridiculous levels of high speed slow motion capture, clean 4K video and other technical benefits which come with a very small chance of dust on sensor, unlike the A7R II which is almost guaranteed to be a dust devil. Why do I say that? Because a backside illuminated sensor renders dust on its cover glass even more sharply than a conventional one! We know the RX models are not dustproof and if you are unlucky enough to get a spot on the sensor it’s a service visit to get it removed, but in my experience with five or them so far I have never had a single dust spot.

    sonyjune1531

    So what? Just retouch? Not when making movies! Admittedly most movie makers will open up the lenses to max or only a stop down on these 1″ sensor cameras, and would open up lenses just the same on the A7R II and never see dust even if it was there. But what about the time you want that ‘American take’ – f/22 at 20mm? Traditionally they were taken in dusty settings for the spaghetti westerns!

    All I can say is that the RX10 has come very close indeed to removing the need for any other camera and it’s been a pleasure to work with the raw files. The RX10 MkII might be so much better that I forget about DSLRs or mirrorless systems and just get on with capturing great images. Or then again…

    – David Kilpatrick

  • Smoke and Mirrors – an idea for Sony

    With the latest Alpha 77, Sony has introduced SLT version II, the new upgraded ‘Translucent’ mirror. This is in an attempt to reduce the ghosting effects created by having an angled mirror between the lens and sensor, the image forming rays passing through a semi-silvered (pellicle) surface, through a thickness of polymer film, and then to the sensor. Having tried it out (update, September 8th) we can confirm that it works. You honestly would never know there was anything between the lens and the sensor.

    But Sony, like all makers, has continued to think in terms of SLR design and the old world of film negatives and slides, where the image always had to be a certain way up on the film, or it would end up being printed and projected reversed left to right.

    In the past a simple reflex mirror for a TLR viewing screen – like the Rolleiflex – did a useful job of turning an inverted image the right way up for viewing. On film at the back of the camera, the image was both inverted and left-to-right. But that did not matter, as the film was viewed through its reverse (back) side to see or print the image.

    Somehow, this old design has been continued to new cameras – but today we use digital sensors. The upside-down or left-to-rightness of the image does not matter as we view the image on a screen or using an EVF. No matter how the image ends up on the sensor, it can always be the right way up and the right way round for us to view.

    So, Sony, when you make you that full-frame Alpha 99 camera change the entire approach. Position the SLT mirror so it reflects the image sideways, upways or downways! And put the SENSOR where it receives the image from the REFLECTED lightpath. Make the mirror reflect 70% of the light and transmit 30%, instead of the other way round.

    There will be no double imaging, no flare patches, no ghosting and not even an extra substrate or layer for the image forming rays to pass through, if the sensor receives the reflected image not the transmitted one. The AF sensor, in the meantime, can be positioned in direct line to the lens where the imaging sensor has been in the past, measuring the image through the SLT mirror.

    This arrangement (©David Kilpatrick, Friday morning, August 26th 2011, scrambled eggs with smoked salmon for breakfast) will in a single stroke remove all the complaints about image degradation as the mirror will provide a perfect image.

    But – would it? Slight lack of plane perfection in the SLT mirror used to transmit the image-forming light, and reflect the AF-measuring light, does not have much effect on the image. Anything less than an optically perfect mirror would fail to create a quality image. It would be like sticking a cheap filter on your lens, or worse. And of course it would never fit into a normally shaped camera body with a full frame sensor and shutter.

    Solid solution

    Ah – the AF sensor, unlike the imaging sensor, does not need cleaning to remove dust spots. So the mirror would not have to be movable. Actually, it would not have to be a pellicle mirror. It could be a lovely big lump of pure glass prism moulded straight on to the AF module itself, even including the condensor-collimator lenses of the AF system. It could be solid glass all the way from mirror surface to AF receptor, and the 45° front face could be to the same optical perfection as the best Sony G lens. Or even the best Carl Zeiss lens. Hell, it could be a Carl Zeiss prism and then the camera could have the CZ logo!

    Diagram above: light blue = solid glass optical prism with 45 degree semisilvered front face; the two white indents at the right hand side indicate AF modules set into the prism rear face. Pink = shutter (optional, ideal system would have electronic shutter only). Dark blue = sensor. Green = top mounted waist level viewing screen, also articulated. A secondary eye-level EVF would or could be used. Design ©DK with a bit of nicked Sony lens cross-section.

    Design? Rollei 6000 all the way! A professional, Hasselbox-shaped thingy to cradle in your hand. With a rotating 24 x 36mm sensor too, so that you change the format aspect by pressing a button not maneouvring the camera body. A 3 inch square OLED on the top like a giant waist-level finder, showing the image vertically or horizontally as you turn the sensor. A waist-level viewing hood for a giant magnified view. Maybe even a monster top prism for the biggest EVF you could imagine!

    Mor realistically, an eye-level EVF in addition to a top plate OLED or LCD panel designed to be hinged up/rotated/twisted – rather like the LCD of the Sony Cyber-Shot DCS R-1, one of the best ever ‘waist level finder’ options fitted to a digital camera to date. In fact something like s giant updated R-1 full framer might do well.

    As for the image sensor, that could be in the well of the camera (mirror aiming down) but maybe having it in the top of the camera, below the viewing screen (mirror facing up) would help gravity reduce the dust issue.

    The point is – it does not matter where the image sensor is placed, it does not have be where the film once was. It does not matter whether the image reaching it is inverted or reflected, as unlike film it does not have an emulsion side or a film-base side, the electronic viewfinder is independent of the orientation of the optical image.

    Future ‘SLT’ EVF cameras – especially a future Alpha 900 replacement – do not need even to resemble today’s DSLRs and can be made better by abandoning ideas fixed in designers’ minds since the era of film cameras.

    – DK

    Technical note: angled partial mirrors, whether prism surface or semi silvered, create polarisation effects, colour shifts and a varying efficiency of reflection depending on the angle of incidence of the ray. This is one barrier to the use of pellicle mirror design for a full-frame model, as the back focus or telecentricity of lenses relative to the format would mean a greater range of incident angles across the mirror surface. Sony appears to have overcome any such problems in the existing APS-C SLT design, and the slightly forward tilt of the mirror (not a true 45°) helps in this respect. I propose the above design in full awareness of related optical and technical issues. I’m not assuming they do not exist – they would need solving.

  • Four new Alphas – and two 'translucent'

    It’s a funny word to use, because the mirrors involved are transparent and not translucent (which implies passing light but not in an image-forming manner). Translucent means semi-opaque, letting light through in the way that an opal perspex sheet or Kodatrace foil does. Transparent means something you can see through.
    But now, thanks to the wonder of changing language, translucent is also going to have to mean transparent, or semi-transparent. Pellicle, semi-silvered, whatever term you wish to use.

    Unfortunately, for this writer the misuse of the word translucent stands as one of the biggest schoolboy howlers ever imposed on the entire world by the ignorance of a corporation. It’s such a glaring error I can hardly bring myself to use the term – others, like Dave Etchells, have happily assimilated the new meaning into their technical lexicon. And as the video above shows, they’ve made it into a trademark, a permanent part of the future of this technology.
    Wiki, and pretty well every dictionary ever published, disagree with Sony’s imaginative use of a word from which they have now removed its exact meaning:
    Wikipedia: “Transparent materials are clear, while translucent ones cannot be seen through clearly.”
    Merriam-Webster:

    trans·lu·cent/transˈlo͞osnt/

    Adjective: (of a substance) Allowing light, but not detailed images, to pass through; semitransparent.
    (the semi bit of semitransparent cited here seems to mean semi-detailed, vaguely delineated – not slightly darker; otherwise the primary definition of the word is diluted).
    There has been some heated argument on dPreview forums about this post of mine (my view is shared by many). No-one has made the point that words evolve to have useful exact meanings. Transparent and translucent are words which may once have shared a common poetic meaning in 18th century descriptive writing, but whose meanings were refined with the progress of science and technology. This process in the course of over 200 years resulted in a useful distinction between the meanings of transparent and translucent. Sony’s commercial misuse of the word Translucent is damaging to the English language and to the scientific and technical lexicon; it predisposes future confusion about the meaning of the words.
    It is also a fait accompli; there is no turning back, since Sony’s corporate stance is much like that of Mrs Thatcher; no u-turns and never admit to be being wrong. They have also no doubt invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in the consultancy involved, and the registration of the term as a trademark, the creation of branding artwork.
    They could have branded the mirror TransLumina® or, more usefully, just called it a transflecting mirror – transmitting-reflecting. That term is already used to describe the sort of mirrors used in ‘Big Brother’ with cameras behind them.



    As to whether it’s a true pellicle mirror (a thin stretched film of vacuum coated Mylar or a similar polymer) no-one seems to be clear. It moves out of the way to allow sensor cleaning but could be relatively fragile. It certainly does not need to move to allow 10fps (Alpha 55) or 7fps (Alpha 33) continuous shooting. Sensor dust is often created within the camera by wear and tear on the shutter mechanism, so access for cleaning is essential and the mirror can not be designed to seal the sensor chamber. The Alpha models still have a shutter, that’s the next thing we shall see eliminated. That old rumour of the 15fps silent shooting Alpha DSLR seems to be more than a rumour; we are almost there.


    For many users, the critical advantage of all four new Sony models will be HD Video with sensor-based in body image stabilisation. This will enable all kinds of lenses from macro to ultrawide or soft focus, manual adaptations and Minolta AF legacy glass to be used for video with confidence.
    Welcome back the circular polariser, unlike mirrorless ILC cameras these new models will not allow the use of linear polarisers without AF efficiency reductions, but exposure should be unaffected as the sensor itself provides the metering with 1200 zones.
    This will be one of the tests reviewers need to carry out on the new pellicle mirror Sony Alpha 33 and 55 models – to confront them with not only polarising filters, but conditions in which light is naturally polarised. How will they render sky gradations or reflections off water?
    Two further Alpha models are being released, which are essentially updates for the 500/550 – the Alpha 580 which will hit the shops before the winter buying season, adding 16.2 megapixels and a 15-zone AF module, HD 1080p video and (non-video) Contrast Detect AF with all Alpha mount lenses. The 560 will not arrive until some time in 2011, using a 14.2 megapixel sensor.
    Versatile features
    More of a landmark than a benchmark, the inclusion of 10fps continuous shooting with active phase detect AF and 16.2 megapixel file size in the Alpha 55 is unprecedented and possibly unforeseen by competitors, in this class of sub-$1000 consumer DSLR (let’s continue to use the term, since they are clothed as DSLRs). The dual format card drive supports the 30Mb/s transfer rate of the latest Class 10 SDHC cards and Sony’s fastest MemoryStick Pro Duo generation. The HD video also has a reasonable 17mbps  bitrate.
    The new technology has been well documented before the launch, but the fine detail of the new cameras is now clearer. The Alpha 55 is some markets will incorporate GPS geo-tagging for stills and videos (we wait to see whether raw files are tagged, and how accurate this is – the accessory Sony geo-tagging system available to date has only permitted JPEG tagging, and has not been accurate enough to know which street in a town the picture was taken in).

    Rumours that the 33 and 55 bodies would be SSM/SAM only, with no internal focus drive, were unfounded as Sony states clearly that both are compatible with ‘the full range’ of over 30 Alpha lenses (indeed, the product shots of the 33 and 55 alone show the 18-200mm SAL DT lens fitted). The 55/33 1080i/60p (1080p in AVCHD camera archive format) video claims ‘smooth, precise’ phase detect auto focus during video shooting, but makes no reference to this being limited to in-lens motor lenses. Therefore we can assume it works with in-body AF drive lenses as well, and you just have to edit the soundtrack.
    The new ISO 25,600 mode does not imply a radical sensor change as it is only available using Multi-Shot Noise Reduction, which requires a burst of 6 frames at the 10fps/7fps native maximum speed of the camera, and can not save raw files. The ISO range of the sensors is 100 to 12,800. Is this range quoted as absolute, or after accounting for the semi-silvered mirror light losses? If it’s the range before allowing for the mirror, then the 14.2 megapixel sensor of the Alpha 33 may be more like the Nikon 3100’s sensor than the NEX (ISO 200-12,800) is.
    Thom Hogan has shown pixel dimensions and size data which support Nikon’s claim to have an entirely different sensor fab line of their own, compared to the A550/NEX sensor. But how about compared to the A33/560 sensor?
    The 55’s new 16.2 megapixel CMOS will probably appear in the forthcoming Alpha 700 successor, which it is believed will form the main Sony exhibit at photokina (Cologne, September 21st-27th). Both models have a new 15-zone AF sensor with three cross sensors, but not f/2.8 sensors – all are designed to operate at f/5.6 virtual aperture. However, there is a hidden clue that the cross sensors may be f/3.5 capable, as the high-speed shooting modes with continuous AF set f/3.5 by default on any lens capable of this (if the lens is, say, only f/5.6 then the largest aperture is always set). Setting f/3.5 implies that this confers an advantage in focus sensitivity over f/5.6, f/4 or any other particular aperture – and that f/3.2, f/2.8 or wider would bring no benefit. That points to some of the sensors having an f/3.5 virtual aperture.
    The new cameras are known as SLTs – Single Lens Translucent – instead of SLR. See my intro. Did they have no English speaking staff on their team? I’m sure there is a German word which describes their mirror correctly. I’d rather have the right German word than the wrong English one. Ah well, as the bloke leaning on the pub bar says, durchsprung vor technik
    Confusing aspects – Auto HDR is said to be available in P/A/S/M modes. I guess in M mode it must leave the aperture alone and change just the shutter speed. Regular bracketing is still limited to a disappointing 3 exposures at 0.7 EV intervals, maximum.
    But you’ll love the direct D-Range button which gives access to D-Range and HDR options directly, and the direct Finder/Screen button which toggles between using the very high resolution EVF with its ‘virtual 1.1X’ 100% view of the subject – effective visual scale, larger than the Alpha 700 and larger than any previous Alpha digital model except the Alpha 900 and 850. That’s one of the benefits of the EVF, a relatively tiny display is viewed through a high magnification ocular and ends up with a ‘window’ on the world which beats the tiny tunnel vision of optical finders. Technically it is very similar to the last EVF produced by Konica Minolta on the Dimage A200, with the benefit of five years’ further development. It has the same 60Hz refresh rate and visually almost raster-free RGB.


    Where the A550 and its earlier stablemates vary slightly around a viewfinder with an effective 0.50X scale (relative to a full frame 100% view using a 50mm lens), the A55 and A33 provide an effective 0.73X and that’s impressive. The ocular is set well back (remember the Konica Minolta A2, and the Sony Cybershot DSC R-1?) because it is a telescope design. This also gives it a very narrow range of possible eye positions, a common feature of EVFs. The eyepoint is close, and you must position your eye precisely.
    The rear screen uses the same type of (Schott?) reinforced glass with (3M?) resin gel adhesive as Canon’s 7D – this totally seals to the LCD module itself eliminating air gaps, and improves contrast. It is a technology first seen in the 7D and becoming standard across the industry though the NEX has shown Sony to have the best implementation so far. It is scratch proof, by the way, and it can be cracked by impact like any other screen.
    The tilt-swivel action is borrowed directly from the Nikon D5000. In fact, it’s so identical in articulation it even included the amazingly silly front facing mode where the screen is obscured by your tripod, hanging under the camera and preventing it from being placed on a flat surface for self-portraits or videos. But it has the same benefit as the Nikon, the screen can be flipped to face the camera and protected completely while you use the EVF.
    Functions familiar from the NEX including Sweep Panorama and Sweep 3D Panorama are built-in and accessed from the main mode dial, which also provides physical settings for all the main modes. Depth of field preview is restored – with the usual button – because is can now actually work. It was always useless in real terms on optical viewfinder cameras, as the focusing screen never represented wide apertures correctly.
    Now, with an EVF, for the first time ever an eye-level Alpha gives absolutely perfect and precise previewing of depth of field and bokeh effects whatever aperture you are working at – even at f/1.4, which was never possible and still isn’t with the A850 or A900 for that matter (which is why their Preview mode is useful).
    You can also preview the exact image appearance. By pressing the AE lock button, the auto gain of the EVF or rear screen are turned off and replaced by an exposure-compensated view. So if you dial in -1 EV (using the adjacent dedicated button), and change the WB, and use a different picture style with more saturation and contrast just pressing AE-Lock will immediately preview your image with these adjustments applied. And you can enlarge in the usual two steps to check auto or manual focus.
    The finder and screen also have a Nikon-style two axis spirit level (flight simulator horizon) display to help you get your horizontals straight and your verticals parallel. It can be activated on either, and does not have to appear on both simultaneously.
    For movie makers, the binaural stereo microphones are a great move. Even on the NEX, the two small top aperture mics give excellent stereo. The 33/55 mics are placed either side of the ‘prism’ housing, rather like the ears on your head. This will give the stereo image created by these cameras a really natural quality. Natural, that is, to a pygmy marmoset monkey… but still, I will wager, the best stereo image of any DSLR/HybriD. And Sony provide a stereo 3.5mm mic jack socket, though without any manual control of gain levels.

    I’m sure we will have to buy the A780 to get that. Click the picture above for a big version. Who says Sony does not have a range to match Nikon or Canon, whether or lenses or of cameras? From the left, the cameras show the current range before we even see the magnesium-bodied Alpha 700 replacement arrive. A900, A850, A580, A560, A55, A33, A390, A290.
    – David Kilpatrick
    Read Sony Press releases and full technical data:
    Alpha 33 and 55 Press Release
    Alpha 560 and 580 Press Release

  • Sony NEX Launch 2010 – full transcription

    .
    The European press launch
    David Kilpatrick recorded the proceedings at Le Meridien Lav Hotel, Split, Croatia on March 11th 2010 using a Zoom H2 portable digital recorder. Shirley Kilpatrick transcribed the audio, with subsequent editing to translate verbal output to read well as text. This is a multi-page document please use the PAGE navigation at the foot of each page to continue reading. It is a very long document.
    Nick Sharples, director of corporate communications for Sony, Europe, welcomed the press to Split in Croatia, and thanked everyone for getting up before breakfast – especially those from Portugal who arrived at midnight (volcanic ash delayed their flights). The launch was synchronised round the world, hence the 8.00am timing for the European meeting.Yoshiyuki Mogami (Vice President of Digital Imaging, Europe) was introduced to explain a little bit more about the business strategy for Digital Imaging in Europe. Yoshiyuki thanked everyone for coming over to Split; the team from Munich had arrived by driving ten hours.Sony started Alpha business in 2006, he said, introducing the Alpha 100 in Morocco. The Alpha 700 was launched in Italy in 2007, the Alpha 900 flagship model was introduced in Scotland in 2008. “We have carried out surveys asking people in Europe which brands they would think of when buying a digital camera; the figure has risen from 50%, to close to 70%. Now we are enjoying a 15% market share in Europe. This figure is OK, but Sony now really has to go to our next step.“But looking at the DSLR as an industry it’s not like two years ago or three years ago. DSLRs were pretty much a booming industry, and that’s why everybody came into his segment. These days the growth of this segment has very much flattened, and of course you could say this is due to economic slow down or recession, but we suspect that the traditional DSLR has a limit in mass appeal to consumers.“So that’s why Sony can try to break this type of barrier. We put together all kinds of voices and views on this technology to see what we can do – we think we have heard the customers’ voice, and really put it into this project.”Mogami-san introduced Toru Katsumoto, senior general manager of Alpha:“Today I would like to officially announce our new ultracompact interchangeable lens camera we have already shown at PMA in February and in Japan. In the current market the boundaries between the three categories – DSLR, compact still camera and camcorder – are already starting to merge.

    “In the area when DSLR and Digital Still Compact merge, we see great possibilities. Let me introduce to you NEX-5 (he holds up the camera, in front of large projected images of the cameras). This beautifully crafted body is designed to bring out the presence of the lens. The body is so slim and compact but without sacrificing any size or balance. The grip on this camera ensures a firm and comfortable hold despite such a slim and compact body. The rigidity and texture of magnesium alloy gives a high grade appearance and solid feel to the camera.
    “NEX-3 is designed for a more casual approach, and can be very attractive especially for those who have yet to explore the world of the DSLR. The slim design comes in three different colour variations, with a unique texture on the grip. It simply feels great in one’s hand in addition to being a stylish camera.
    “The key concept of NEX-5 and NEX-3 is to combine the best of both worlds – the image quality and power of expression of the DSLR, with the portability and ultra-compact design of a digital compact camera. We strongly believe that NEX-5 and NEX-3 are cameras that are capable of satisfying customers’ needs from both DSC and DSLR segments. Namely, compact digital still camera users who are motivated to step up from DSC, and DSLR users who are demanding a more compact camera without compromising DSLR power.
    “Professional quality in your pocket is the buzzword for this camera. There are six elements:

    • DSLR quality in still and moving images
    • Compact and stylish
    • Power of expression derived from interchangeable lenses
    • Making creative work easier
    • Beautiful high definition movies easily filmed
    • High speed continuous shooting, 7fps

    “The APS-C sensor successfully packs DSLR quality in a small body (he removes the lens and shows the sensor). The new sensor is significantly larger than the FourThirds sensor, resulting in a higher pixel count and superior picture quality.
    “Our designers have done a great job; the philosophy is a minimalist design. The lens itself is small, but the body size is so small that the lens looks dominant overall. With the pancake lens, it comes close to the size of a point and shoot camera. It is the world’s smallest, and is lighter than either of the rival brands (Olympus and Panasonic profiles shown on screen but not named).
    “The depth of the flange back on the camera is 18mm, the world’s thinnest. This is why we can make it so slim. There are three new lenses. Also conventional Alpha A-mount lenses, currently in customers’ hands, can be used via our mount adaptor.”
    Katsumoto-san described the user interface with its virtual scroll wheel, adjusting depth of field; and the sweep panorama including the 3D function. “During the sweep motion, the camera generates two pictures, one for the right eye and the other for the left. You do not need two lenses for 3D.”
    He said that Handycam experience had been used to set up high definition recording. Toru emphasised the value of Alpha NEX division working together with other Sony technologists.
    “NEX-5 and NEX-3 are only the first two products to be offered by Sony in this emerging area. We believe that products based on the combination of a large imaging sensor and interchangeable lenses are not limited to NEX-5 and NEX-3; today, let me take the opportunity to reveal our second proposal to you briefly. As I am speaking now, a dedicated group of engineers is in the process of developing a new camcorder with the interchangeable lens system (he shows a mockup image).
    “This camcorder will come with an EXMOR HD APS-C sensor for DSLR quality video in AVCHD form. Like the NEX-5 and NEX-3, with an adaptor, this new camcorder is also compatible with current Alpha lenses allowing videographers to access a wide range of high performance lenses to be used to express one’s creativity like never before.
    “Needless to say, its body design is specially optimised for video shooting. Details of this product will be communicated soon, I’d say around the Autumn area, so please stay tuned. The combination of a large image sensor and interchangeable lenses can create whole new dimensions and expression and possibilities.
    “To express our strength in such products, we would like to introduce the phrase “Beyond Our Eyes” which contains the following meanings – bringing new experiences, and style of unforeseen dimensions, that evoke deep emotions, and creating a visual world beyond how our eyes can see in both still photography and video.”
    After this, the conference was officially over, and journalists were asked to re-convene for region specific in depth meetings. The meeting for the UK and Scandinavia was headed by Paul Genge of Sony UK. 

    The UK in-depth introduction to NEX

    Rachel Banin, head of the Alpha product division for Sony UK, introduced the hands-on press conference for UK and Scandinavian journalists:
    This product is a new and exciting surprise for Sony, and we’re really excited about bringing it to market, and we’ve got really big plans for it – and high expectations for it also.
    Here is a UK-specific slide, highlighting what we expect the market potential to be for this kind of category – compact interchangeable lens cameras. We think that market is going to be about 100,000 units in FY 2010 (April 2010 to March 2011) and we’re very encouraged by the positive actual sales results that we’ve now seen come through for FY 09.
    Certainly looking at the kind of coverage which the GFK data indicator gives, that 30,000 units (2009) might even be on the kind of pessimistic side. We’ve seen some good developments so far and we’re expecting a lot, lot more in 2010 and the key reasons for that, I think, are obviously new brands coming into the marketplace, including Sony
    Sony is starting to be able to address a market which is not just DSLR consumer. That’s very important because we don’t believe this market is going to 100% cannibalise the DSLR business. We think it’s incremental and by appealing to people who are used to using a digital still camera – and who are perhaps ready to take an upgrade to a camera that offers them a higher performance, better flexibility and better creativity – we can generate this kind of business potential.
    So communicating with consumers has been a very, very important part of the product development process for NEX in particular. We’ve really involved them right from day one in terms of testing out concepts with them, testing out some prototypes and then, finally, testing them with an almost complete product and I have to say the response has been very, very positive from the groups that we tested.
    They were tested also with similar products available from the market place at the moment including some micro DSLR products, for which there were certain limitations identified – be that physical limitations, or limitations in the performance of the camera itself. The response that we got to NEX was what we were really hoping to achieve – that it was something new and unique, that it was a completely different camera category in itself and revolutionary in that sense, and easy to use and allows the consumer to take that step further and get the extra special results that they can’t get from a digital still camera.
    So that’s really it as an introduction to the product. I’m going to hand over to Paul now. He’s going to talk in a lot more detail about the NEX products.
    Paul Genge, technical sales manager for Sony Alpha division UK:
    You remember last night’s dinner when I asked you which was the camera you would like to own, given to you, any choice, you could have whatever you like. I was fairly confident that by the end of the day most of you would switch your allegiance to wanting at least one of these. I think as soon as you get a hands on opportunity with these, from the moment you pick it up and realise what a quality proposition it really is, it’s really a nice camera to use, shoot and own. So you’ll get your opportunity a bit later. Right, let’s get cracking.
    Sony is very much a technical innovation company. We operate in numerous electronic areas and every business that we operate in has radically changed over the last ten years or less really. I mean, it wasn’t so long ago when I was a little kid with the Argos catalogue writing down what I wanted on my Christmas list – a Sony tape Walkman. Today, nobody wants a Walkman, it’s all iPods, it’s mobile phones and the way you get your music and they way you handle your music is entirely different to what it was like ten years ago.
    I used to sell these – a 35mm compact camera, eight or nine years ago was a big thing that cost £300. Today for £300 you can have a glossy slimline, feature-rich, high quality, digital compact camera. Digital photography has changed not only the form factor but also the way the customer experiences photography.
    Anyone still got a big-box CRT TV at home?
    Today televisions are slimline, they hold to the wall, and in the future is 3D and internet download services direct to your television. You can also plug many devices into them and use your television for other purposes than just watching television. Today we record to hard disc drives and we watch high definition movies on Blu-Ray. It wasn’t so long ago that we all had our individual cassettes and woe betide you if you recorded your football over the top of Mum’s Coronation Street!
    Today those arguments don’t exist. Every market has changed radically, everything has been improved, everything has been made faster, everything is delivering a better consumer experience. Or is it?
    Because on the left-hand side there(he shows a slide with two cameras, the smaller on the left) you’ve got a Minolta Dynax camera and on the right you’ve got an Alpha 550. Have we really changed SLR photography? I don’t think so because really the functionality, operational experience and form factor is nearly identical.
    Yes, we’ve taken out the film gubbins and we’ve put in the digital and we’ve added a tilting screen because it’s digital with Live View but, actually, is it any more appealing a product proposition as it was ten years ago? Not relevant, it’s still seen as a specialist product, it’s still seen as something you’ve got to learn and experience and “get into” photography. So really we haven’t actually delivered a new consumer propositional experience in the same way as all those other devices have done – until now.


    NEX design philosophy
    The NEX system has been designed from a fresh start. A clean sheet of paper approach. We knew what we wanted to achieve and we knew the boundaries in which, the confines in which, we had to operate to deliver the product. But we actually wanted to radically change the way that you used the camera, and then alter its appeal to the consumer, and we think that we’ve done that in a totally different way to all of these other mirrorless styled cameras.
    It’s a totally different user experience and the user we’re targeting is in this(upgrading consumer digicam owner) category because the SLR camera market is dominated by heritage brands. There’s the Canons, the Nikons, there’s ourselves on the back of the Minolta legacy, there’s Pentax and there’s the likes of Olympus.
    Our Cybershot and all DSCs (digital still camera – industry term for consumer digitals) are in a range where you’ve got a plethora of products. You can buy anything from any brand, some you’ve heard of, many you haven’t and the majority of them take a reasonably good picture from a certain price point upwards. It’s actually getting more and more difficult to separate the brands themselves. They all have this feature or that, they all have a smart shutter, they all have this many megapixels, they’re all this small and they all have that much zoom.
    So where is the defining factors? Is there actually anything different between any of them? Yes we’ve got features like sweep panorama at Sony, but it’s one feature in a cluster of lots of things on the ticket at retailers. How does the customer separate one from another? So the market’s a wash.
    Do you buy a digital compact camera to replace your previous digital compact camera? You’ve probably had about four or five of them by now in the lifespan of digital camera development. Or are you ready for the next step? Do you actually want the best picture quality and some creative input in the way that you take your pictures? But actually you’re a little bit worried, you’re a little bit put off by what an SLR is and what it perhaps stands for. For most people an SLR is too big, too expensive and too difficult to understand and we do research on this. We’ve understood what the consumers’ voice is because we’ve listened to it since 2006 when we entered this market four years ago.
    The cameras I’m about to show you and talk you through are thirteenth and fourteenth Alpha introductions since 2006. In four years we’ve launched twelve cameras, and this is the thirteenth and fourteenth. For the first time we are bridging the gap between digital compact cameras and what is truly digital SLR, and we believe globally that there is up to 10 million potential customers in this market, and our solution for their demands we’re calling NEX.
    Our engineering department, our technicians and our designers wanted to deliver a product that was more closely suited to a digital compact camera than naturally a digital SLR. However, we wanted to deliver the quality and experience in photography that you take of a digital SLR but we didn’t want to go down the road of covering it with a plethora of buttons and external controls that make it appear complicated from day one.
    That’s the sort of thing; it’s in there, it’s up to you to unlock it and use it to its full potential, so the day you pick this camera up for the first time you use it it can be as simple as your digital compact camera, because that’s our primary market – digital compact camera upgraders.
    So here is the next focus, this is where we want to develop from. The largest potential for us is in the digital compact camera upgrader market, and at the same time we wanted to keep one foot in the sort of legacy part of digital SLR market because there is another customer, a niche market perhaps, but somebody like myself and the majority of you who are SLR enthusiasts. We know how to use an SLR – but actually at the same time you find an SLR itself to be big, heavy and cumbersome and not the sort of thing you would take with you all the time. Maybe NEX can provide that solution as well.
    With a T on the end, this is your NEXt camera. Your next progression from a digital compact camera. It’s going to deliver you the quality and photographs that you’ve always wanted and it does movies too. So, shoot now, create well. Professional quality in your pocket. Take it everywhere. Take the best pictures and those pictures will make you go “wow” when you download them and show them to your friends and your family.
    It is about giving DSLR quality and experience and control without the complication to a digital compact camera user, both stills and video. It’s got to be “cool”, it’s a Sony product after all so it’s got to look great – and it has interchangeable lenses, creativity, HD video and high-speed continuous shooting.


    The products
    Right, let’s get into the nitty gritty detail of it all. There’s two cameras, the NEX-5 and NEX-3. NEX-3 is actually a derivative of the NEX-5, they are very similar cameras. They are like siblings if you like of each other, very similar specs. Essentially NEX-5 is for the experienced user and comes in black and silver;  and for the absolute beginner NEX-3 comes in silver, red and black … and you can see the colour variations across the table there.
    When our engineers set out with that fresh sheet of paper they lay down various boundaries that they wanted to keep within, targets that they wanted to meet in the end fulfilment of this product. Number one, it had to have a DSLR sensor. We are not the world’s largest semiconductor manufacturer, but we are not about to try and reinvent the wheel yet again, try and re-educate the monkey that everything they’ve seen before wasn’t good enough and actually this is better again.
    No, we already produce fantastic DSLR sensors, we’ve been equipping our cameras since 2006 with them so why change that? APS-C is there and it’s understood in retail – and predominantly the consumer understands it as well in the DSLR category. So there is one boundary, now that is a defining point because you’ve got to squeeze that into a very small camera and that’s not easily achieved.
    It had to be the size of a compact camera, so when it’s fitted with its pancake lens it had to be as small and pocketable as possible. The lenses obviously need to be interchangeable, that gives the flexibility and control of shooting when you’re out in the field, and to have some inter-compatibility with our existing products in our Alpha line-up.
    So those were the four defining factors and I think they’ve achieved a fantastic job. They’ve done what they set out to do.
    I want to draw your attention to a couple of key points. Three sensor sizes are shown in this slide; digital compact camera on average these days has a 1 over 2.4 size sensor. You’ve got four-thirds or micro four-thirds in the already mirrorless category, and then there’s what we’ve got in our DSLR cameras, the APS-C size sensor.
    The difference between these sensor sizes makes a massive difference in the way the images actually result and the future prospect of development beyond what you see today. In a year’s time we could be talking about different cameras and there’s more potential in an APS-C size sensor, we believe, to continue to develop technologies.
    We offer twice the sensitivity, or one-stop greater sensitivity, over our competitors in the micro four-thirds category. At the moment their sensitivity maxes out at 64 hundred, ours, in this camera, goes up to 12 eight hundred. Now, nobody shoots black cats down coal mines very often so it’s not actually that this is the important value. What is important is what it does lower down the scale. An extended latitude range and noise reduction system (means) we actually achieve less noise at the lower ISOs than our competitors.
    There is less depth of field generated with a larger sensor. That beautiful defocused effect is something that separates a DSC from a DSLR. You can’t get that effect (with a smaller sensor). You’ve simply got very little control over getting that effect with a modern day digital compact camera and even with the other mirrorless cameras, the effect is there but not as great as it is with the APS-C.


    Sensor performance
    Let’s talk about noise. So we go from 200 to 12,800 ISO and we’ve got an EXMOR APS-HD CMOS Sensor – we’ve actually put in the HD abbreviation to give the presence of video – and the BIONZ processor. There is less noise at 200 than our competitors have at 100 and the trend continues all the way up the ISO scale. So we really are delivering the best image quality without the customer even realising potentially. Leave it on auto ISO and the camera’s going to select for itself the ISO, and it actually means that you can take pictures in circumstances that otherwise you would probably have thought not possible. With higher ISOs you can shoot without flash. In a romantic sort of restaurant situation which a compact camera would automatically chuck the flash into and change completely the ambience of the picture, you wouldn’t get the feel of the situation you were in. So this is the best image quality in any conditions.
    Let’s talk about video. Comparison here with a camcorder. The camcorder has a 1 over 2.88 sensor and is even smaller than a digital compact camera and records high definition movies now, granted the pixel count on a camcorder is not as high as on a digital compact camera, but there is still a massive difference in the potential of things like background defocus and resolution. It’s down to the sensor size and the of the lens.
    OK well, that’s the techie stuff about the sensor and why we’ve chosen to adopt an APS–C size. Now let’s talk a little bit about the design of the cameras and their actual appeal. It’s a complete break from what you would consider normally to be an SLR style. They’re very slim, they’re very well made, the fit and finish of them is fantastic, but there isn’t a plethora of buttons. We’ve kept them clean and free so at the point of retail where the customer first handles this camera they will see that actually it’s very easy for them. There isn’t actually a load of buttons that they’re frightened of.
    Differences between 3 and 5, and DSLRs
    The NEX 5 is a very stylish design available in the black and silver finish. The NEX-3 is available in the three colours and has a more compact camera-styled look to it. It’s subtle but it’s there. We’ve managed to package all of this into a really small compact. Weight, you take the body, you add the battery, you add the pancake lens and we are significantly lighter than the competition. If you switch the pancake lens for the standard zoom, an 18-55, we’re actually no longer the lightest but the reason is that some of our competitors have really reduced the weight and the material construction of their lenses to make the overall combination as light as possible. Their lenses don’t actually have a great feel of quality about them, whereas ours is a nice combination between the body and lens. Put the flash in as well and we’re about in the midst, we’re certainly the lightest with the pancake, but we’re in the midst when it comes to the standard zoom.
    Compare that to a digital SLR and there’s a massive difference – 887 grams for the Alpha 550, which is its natural comparable model in our line-up if you like, and the NEX is only 503 grams. That’s some 44% difference in overall weight. A lot of difference if you’ve got to carry that think with you all day, every way you go and you’ve probably got kids with you as well and you’ve got all their paraphernalia and stuff that they need and you’re carrying this alongside and it all adds up. So it’s a much more enjoyable experience to carry this around with you wherever you go.
    As design goes they actually have a family look to them, Notice there’s no cinnabar. The orange colour has been chosen to remain the preserve of the true Alpha DSLR category and the colour complement for NEX-5 and 3 is silver, white and black, so the Alpha logo is in silver on this camera.
    NEX 5 is a magnesium alloy construction, so the body panels are magnesium alloy. NEX-3 is a polycarbonate plastic body, so it has that feel of a compact camera. Lenses are the same for both so whichever camera you end up buying the lenses are exactly the same. They’re actually finished in a brushed aluminium and the way they fit to the body, the tightness of the mount, the way they zoom, they’re really high quality. Real pleasurable experience, summed here as a high grade design that emanates a sense of oneness. It does feel part and parcel of the camera.


    E-mount to A-mount adaptor
    We’ve already got a line-up of over thirty lenses in Alpha, the A-mount, and we have an adaptor which will fit between the two. If you do wish toy use one of these Alpha lenses on the face of the NEX camera you can do, you just need this lens adaptor to make that possible. Here’s a good example, the new or recently introduced DT 30mm 2.8 macro. We are not launching the NEX camera with a bespoke E-mount macro lens, but if you want to do macro photography you can go about it this way. Just a couple of things to point out here, E-mount is all electronic coupling. There is no mechanical aperture as there is with Apha, so it is probably closer to the EOS system. There is no mechanical coupling at all so we have to transfer what is an electronic signal in the front of this camera to a mechanical closure within the lens, the aperture, and this does that. It provides that interface.
    However – and our technicians have been battling with this night and day – they are unable to offer reassured autofocus with Alpha lenses so that feature is disabled. You will only be able to use manual focus with any Alpha lens with an adaptor on NEX.
    There is also a tripod attachment which fits to the underside and comes with the mount adaptor to spread the load because the weight of some of our Alpha lenses is very high; they were designed for a different system originally, and the weight is all of the way forwards. Rather than place the tripod mount on the camera and take the load from there, instead we’ve placed it on the mount adaptor. OK, so there is some incompatibility and some compatibility in the way that you use Alpha lenses on NEX cameras. But it does mean that the potential is there for people who are already in the Alpha system, who have invested in some good quality lenses and want to get the maximisation of that with a smaller more portable system.
    E-mount lenses
    Right, E-mount lenses: our launch lenses are 16mm ƒ2.8; 18-55mm ƒ3.5-5.6; 18-200mm ƒ3.5-6.3. The subtle differences between these, all three have circular apertures so you do get that beautiful defocus effect without the shape of the aperture forming in the highlights in the background. These are the first Alpha cameras to not have in-body stabilisation. To go with the miniaturisation as much as possible, it wasn’t possible to incorporate the sensor shift technology that our Alpha cameras are known for, instead we’re opting for the optical in-lens stabilisation which we’ve used for the Cybershot and for Handicam for many, many years. It’s great that we’ve got both technologies within the Sony family because we can now adapt the right technology for the purpose and what delivers the best consumer experience.
    So, bearing in mind we are primarily trying to attract DSC users to this category, optical stabilisation is something they have probably already experienced in their use of the Cybershot cameras. There is also is slight difference between the performance of optical steady shot in the 18-55 and in the 18-200. The 18-200 is equipped with active mode. Now if you’re familiar with our handicam line-up of products, the active technology is there for when recording video. It’s also in our Cybershot HX5 because that’s equipped with AVCHD video. Active mode provides up to 10 times more stable a viewing on video recording. It can actually move the optics better, and in a greater range, to combat camera shake. That will be in the 18-200.
    We’re particularly proud of the fact that we’ve brought down the distance between the mount and the sensor to 18mm. It’s 44 and half mm in our traditional DSLR styled product and simply by taking out the mirror box and the mirror and everything and bringing that back we’ve made the camera ever so thin. That has also obviously meant that the focusing of lenses has changed and that’s where the issue exists with the mount adaptor trying to provide assured focusing.
    Actually if you look at the diameter of the mount they’re not that different. There’s only about 4mm in it, so for such a small camera, the large part of the front of it is the open aperture, the mount where you attach your lens. It’s dominated by this great big ring. That’s just how small it is. So when you come to think, this is like the Tardis. This side of the camera is hollow. This side of the camera is the battery, where’s all the rest of it? Where’s all the electronics? It’s a marvel.


    The user interface
    We have completely changed the way that you operate the camera. As we said right at the beginning people think digital cameras are too complicated and too confusing. They can handle a digital compact, they have every confidence in that, so what we have tried to do in the NEX is try to deliver a compact style experience, bringing the functionality and control of a digital SLR. So the back of the camera is very clean.
    You have two soft keys, top and the bottom, which control various functions that appear on the screen here depending on the mode setting. You have a control wheel which has a North, South, East and West input and rotation so you interact all the camera between these three button controls and the control wheel. It’s actually quite a speedy process, the software guys have learned from compact cameras, mobile phones, and incorporated it in the NEX.
    The screens are are very colourful, animated interactive screens. You can have a black background, you can have white, you can have blue. We have an electronic dial which responds just like a normal wheel would do by rotating the control. This I think is absolutely fantastic.
    Every camera comes with an instruction manual. What’s the first thing that the customer does, particularly if they are a male? “Don’t need that.” Straight in the bin! Straight in the recycling box! What we’ve done is build in a photographic guide better than the instruction book. The instruction book just tells you “this is the feature and this is what it does”. It doesn’t tell you how to use it. It doesn’t tell you when to use it. So we’ve got eighty screens of English with full photographic explanation of settings, controls, lighting, composition, how to take a better picture built into the camera and you can read that like a book.
    In the menu there is an option to go straight into the screen and scroll through all eighty pages and learn photography but actually, when you’re out shooting with the camera, dependent on the settings at the time, only the relevant pages of the shooting tips are shown to you. So you can read it as a reference book when you first get the camera, think you understand it, you’re out in the field taking pictures and you think “I read something about how I could do x, y, z and I can’t remember it now”.
    Shooting Tips is a soft key at the bottom of the screen, so you press it and all the relevant information is there for you to digest and get a better picture. It teaches you photography. So you’ve got that built in – Shooting Tips.
    We’ve also got a Help Guide. Now this was introduced with the Alpha 230s and 380s. The Help Guide as you’re scrolling through the various setting is actually telling you what those settings are for. The Help Guide can be turned off, so once you’re familiar with your settings than you don’t need those to get in the way and slow down the operation of the camera you can turn that particular feature off – but Shooting Tips is always there.
    Intelligent Auto (iAuto)
    We have introduced Intelligent Auto to Alpha for the first time. This has been in Cybershot, so anybody coming up from a digital compact will be familiar with this. It’s also in our Handycam products as well. It has scene recognition, automatically recognising that it’s a landscape, or a portrait or whatever it might be and setting the appropriate settings. This is just fantastic. The first time you buy a digital SLR and you are met with ƒ-numbers, pphhf, you don’t understand it and… “oh it’s the aperture”… then you get into a full conversation… oh, that controls depth of field.
    Depth of field? What’s that mean? Agricultural term? It’s too complicated. There’s too many phrases used, there’s too many acronyms and numbers and mathematics and… ppphhhh oh no! It doesn’t excite me, sorry, I just want to take nice pictures.
    Okay, let’s change this completely. Let’s completely change the way that you work the aperture. You’re in Intelligent Auto or any one of the scene modes, you’d like to control what we know as the depth of field. Easy, ‘background defocus’ – you press the centre of the control ring and the background defocus screen appears just as you see here, and there’s a scale on the right hand side, going from crisp at the top to defocus at the bottom.
    As you rotate the wheel, this dot moves between the two, so you’ve got it there with a crisp background. You might like it with a defocused background. You see the result before you shoot because the camera is closing down the aperture live. It’s doing it for you. It’s showing you a live preview of what your end result will be and it’s using gain-up on the sensor to keep the exposure consistent, so it’s not like depth-of–field preview on a digital SLR which doesn’t give a very good consumer experience. That shuts the aperture down, makes everything go dark and you can’t see what’s in focus or not. It can be impossible to use in some dimmer lighting conditions. You have to have a fantastically bright view finder and lovely lighting conditions to be able to get the benefit. Here, somebody who doesn’t understand apertures, doesn’t understand depth-of-field, gets the result they’ve seen in magazines but without complication. Very easy. A totally different way of interacting with what is a photographic control.
    If you look in scene selections, you’ve got landscape, macro, night portrait, night view, portrait, sports action and sunset. All built into the camera and all selected by the user and usable further with background defocus mode adjusted. For those that are conversant with their photography and want the interaction control, you have got the usual Alpha display of shutter speed and aperture combination.
    When you play back the images, if you wish, you have the full display of histograms and EXIF data shown. So it is as “complicated” if you like, as a DSLR candid so somebody coming down from that niche market has the things that they look for but at the same time we’ve tried to accommodate as possible the user of a digital compact camera with their expectations, their knowledge without making it overly complicated from day one.


    Sweep Panorama
    So we’ve covered quality. We’ve covered compactness and style and now we’ve covered functionality – they way you interact with the camera and make the settings. Now I’m going to tell you about what makes this camera different to everybody else’s in which features that you’ve got  like sweep panorama. Sweep panorama has been with us in Cybershot for some time now. We introduced it in the HX1.
    It’s a case of being able easily to take panoramic pictures. In the past it’s been a case of get a tripod, get a cable release, line up the camera, swing it round… then you’ve got to combine it in software, three days later you might have a picture. Doesn’t make for an easy life. Sweep panorama is now in Alpha for the first time. You’ve got two settings, wide and standard. In wide, you shoot 226° on the horizontal, in standard 149°. In wide that is 12,416 pixels wide.
    Vertical? You can also use sweep panorama this way. You can shoot 106° in standard or 151° in extra wide with a maximum resolution on the vertical of 5536 pixels. Sweep panorama in Alpha is different to sweep panorama in Cybershot. NEX actually takes photographs. When you are doing a sweep panorama, it is assembling a series of exposures. When the shutter actually fires for each one. With Cybershot, it records video and buffers film frames out of to assemble the sweep panorama. The resolution is a lot lower.
    This is where you see the difference. This is SLR quality with DSC functionality. (Paul showed panoramic prints from pictures by Duncan McEwan, taken in Germany on a trip – he said that Sony would be offering a print service, but many high street outlets now offered panorama printing as well).
    Vertical panorama – sweeping down from the sky, the camera shows its dynamic range, blending the exposures as the light changes. Standard pan 15 megapixels, extra wide 23 megapixels(Paul showed the end results of NEX versus Cybershot HX-5 panoramas) –10 million more pixels in the Alpha NEX panorama.
    This is the first camera in the market to be able to record 3D with panorama. They way that it does it is to take two pictures, one as if mimicking the left eye, one as if mimicking the right eyes, so you’ve got the separation. As you are sweeping across, it’s recording two sections on each exposure. The playback of those images on the Bravia TV with the glasses is fantastic, experiencing the depth of the final result. What it actually saves is a movie file. You do need to have either the camera to play back the image, or a PlayStation 3. There will be a firmware upgrade for both the camera and PlayStation 3 (scheduled for July, hopefully mid rather than late). This technology is not actually ready yet, so we will not be launching these cameras with this feature enabled. 3D will be on the box, but it’s something which comes later.
    You will need a Bravia 3D TV.
    Multi shot modes
    Building on existing technology, in Alpha 500 and 550 we launched Auto HDR. High Dynamic Range is about expanding the latitude in the final photograph by using two different exposures. It takes the underexposed picture and produces the highlight areas from that, and takes the overexposed picture and uses the more shadowy areas from it, to merge to one finally saved result.
    In NEX, it now takes takes three pictures – under, average and over exposed – merged into one final result. The improvement is in the mid-tones, because it has actually captured them in the average exposure. It actually saves you two pictures; it saves the auto HDR, and the average exposure. Even if your HDR does not work, you still have a normally exposed picture.
    You also have manual over-ride, so you’ve got HDR Manual and can go up to 6EV difference, a massive difference (Paul shows examples).
    Anti Motion Blur is built into Cybershot. It takes six photographs, and it uses the best bits of all of them. Camera shake is random, so is noise; it detects the noise, and extracts it, so it only uses the best bits of the exposure and the sharpest bits of the exposure, merges them all into one and you end up with one final, great, saved result.
    (Paul did not cover the similar Night Scene multishot mode, which takes six images and improves noise and detail).
    Seven frames per continuous shooting puts the NEX on par with a DSLR in speed priority mode. When you have a subject entering a zone where you have pre-focused, you are guaranteed the capture the best moment. If you need it with AF and AE update between shots, it is reduced to 2.3 frames per second. Speed priority is for fixed conditions, where the subject is passing into the zone of focus.


    Autofocus
    Autofocus performance is one of the challenging areas for this category – to try to offer DSLR performance on cameras actually not equipped with a mirror, and not equipped with Phase Detection autofocus. This is the benchmark, the traditional DSLR with 20-plus years’ worth of autofocus since Minolta pioneered it in 1985. Now we are moving into video-based contrast detect autofocus. We would refer to the digital SLR as still the best camera to use for sports photography – anything that’s high speed, requiring fast-updating autofocus, the DSLR is going to do the better job.
    For everyday snaps and in most user conditions, NEX is going to do perfectly well. We actually believe that we have the best on-sensor autofocus technology possible. And that is a first for Alpha, because none of our Alpha cameras to date have offered on-sensor, live view, autofocus. We’ve got 25 zones spread all the way across the image area; you can select those with flex spot, you’ve got centre focus as well, and wide area multi-zone. You select as a user which is most sensible for the subject conditions.
    That’s more sensor positions than Panasonic, significantly more than Olympus, and we believe our speed is as fast as Panasonic who seem to be about the best so far. We are seeing a consistently of about 0.3 seconds focusing on any focal length, with all of our lenses, which is a bit quicker than even Panasonic on telephoto.
    You also have got Direct Manual Focus. This was introduced by Minolta in their legacy SLR system. Direct Manual Focus means that when the camera autofocuses, if it is not right, you just turn the end of the lens and manually focus. It automatically goes into manual focus control and automatically enlarges the image for you on live view. Manual focus assist pops up at 6X enlargement, if you want 12X enlargement you press the softkey at the bottom, you jump to 12X. This is another first.
    Additional features
    We put Smile Shutter into the camera; it is also in Alpha, but I don’t think that much used. It’s a great way of taking pictures of happy families without using the self timer (the camera also has Face Detection – Ed.).
    The screen is an absolute joy to use. We introduced TruBlack technology in our photo frames and some of our camcorders. TruBlack is a gapless or bonded screen assembly which cuts down on internal reflections. You get the maximum resolution out of the 920,000 dots on the 3 inch screen. It is 55% brighter than the Alpha 550 screen. And the screen tilts. You can lift it up 80°, you can drop it down 45°, so you really can shoot above your head or below your waist, and get some creative angles. For the price point that is unique in the micro category.
    It is able to take SD and MemoryStick, with automatic recognition of which you are using. We are now doing Sony branded SD cards.
    Dust? Well, dust is a big problem, and something to worry about in a camera without a mirror and with an exposed sensor when you change the lens. So we have built in our anti dust system, vibrating the sensor on shutdown, it tries to dislodge the dust particles. But you are going to need to be somewhat more careful and considerate because of the exposed sensor.
    Flash – it is an accessory, it is attached when you need it. It comes free in the box. The noise is so low you can take pictures in darker conditions without flash, that’s why we did not incorporate it, we went for the smallest possible accessory flash which can still provide great quality results. It draws the power from the camera’s battery, you simply elevate it to turn it on.


    Video
    The camera is equipped with AVCHD, a first for Alpha. We have deliberately held off launching digital SLRs with video until we knew we could get in right. We are providing film-quality, AVCHD 1080 on the NEX-5. For NEX-3, subtle difference, it records 720p at MPEG4 compression.(A short video clip with music was shown). You press the movie button on the back of the camera to start and stop your movie recordings.
    That brings Alpha now into the line-up with Handycam and Cybershot, equipped with AVCHD – full factor AVCHD, if you like, not the ‘lite’ version that we co-developed with Panasonic and they introduced in their models. Which means the compression isn’t as hard on the video, the audio channels and clearer, the picture has less artefacts to it. AVCHD requires a huge processing capacity. We wanted to get it right for the DSLR sensor. Quality, and usage really. It now means the whole family records to the same format, and we will continue to push forward on this with further product introductions in the future, so stay tuned on this. Video is now as important as taking stills.
    For the consumer, they can go out of the house with one device. And they can record fantastic quality stills, and video when they want, where they want. They can take a still picture, but sometimes it’s moving pictures with audio that actually add an extra dimension and more enjoyment.
    If you want even better audio quality, there is an accessory microphone that goes in to the Active Shoe on the top of the camera so that you can record – with the flick of a switch – either 90° coverage or 120° coverage. That is again powered from the main camera battery.
    Playback is via HDMI to your Bravia TV. That brings Alpha into the family network of High Definition. You can record your movies to Blu-Ray for posterity, up to 50 gigabytes of data.
    That’s really all the technical stuff. I’m now going to take you through how we are going to be packaging these products and sending them out to market, the kit formations, and the various accessories we have to complement these cameras.
    Marketing matters
    NEX-5, NEX-3 – we have spoken about the colour differences. The ‘Go Out With Me’ package is a 16mm lens f/2.8 pancake in the box with body, so it’s a one box, fixed lens combination. However, when the camera is fitted with a fixed lens, the menu system activates a digital zoom and it only works when it’s with the pancake 16mm. 10X digital, precision zoom enables you still to have some zoom just like a compact camera user would.
    The ‘Snap Package’ is the standard 18-55mm lens in combination with either body. ‘Go Out With Me and Snap’ is a twin-lens kit, with the 16mm and the 18-55mm. The ‘Sports Travel’ package is only available with the NEX-5 camera, and is the 18-200mm lens in the box with the body.
    Optical Steady Shots – the benefits are that it’s designed to match the performance of the lens, and the combination used, subject matter and suchlike, you do have a live stabilised view on the LCD, and it means the body is as small as possible. Obviously the disadvantage is that we need to stabilise each lens. We have to design the lenses with built-in stabilisation. But it really means that for those Alpha users that want to use their existing lenses with the lens mount adaptor, obviously there isn’t any form of stabilisation.
    We think the twin lens kit is going to be the most popular combination. We are working on various cases, there is a luxury strap, a soft carry case, and a wrapping cloth. I really like these wrapping cloths! The Optical Viewfinder goes on top of the camera, and is matched to the 16mm pancake. The mount adaptor is manual focus only.
    Lens adaption was popular with digital cameras before the lenses got so versatile, and it certainly is very popular still with Handycams. But it’s never been done in this configuration before with an interchangeable lens camera. So, two converters – a wide and a fisheye. The wide is 0.75X magnification, and the fisheye is 0.62X. It bayonets directly on to the front of the pancake. The most expensive part of buying the lens is the autofocus system, the aperture control and what have you. That makes the fisheye lens in the Alpha lineup (the 16mm f/2.8 full frame Minolta design now made by Sony – Ed.) £600, more than most people could justify when stepping up from a compact camera. But they like the creativity, the effect of a fisheye picture.
    So let’s make it easier and cheaper for them – this adaptor, the fisheye lens, just bayonets on to the front of the 16mm lens. Brilliant! Likewise, the ultra-wide converter too.
    Body accessories – spare battery, we are going to do a mains adaptor for it too. Obviously memory cards. We are going to do a screen protector, polycarbonate clip-on. And this is a great combination kit – the wrapping cloth, the luxury strap, spare battery and a lens-cap holder all in one box, great value for money.


    Question and Answer time
    The press was invited to ask questions. The first of these was – what are the prices!
    A: Retailers are free to set their own pricing, and we have actually done something in the UK for the first time. We have actually sent all the dealers information on the NEX system before the embargo. So it’s gone live now. You can go and check on internet and see the prices now.
    NEX-5 equipped with an 18-55mm lens will be something between £550 and £600. NEX-3 with the same lens will be about £100 less, something between £450 and £500. The 16mm lens on its own will be around about £200-220; the 18-200mm lens on its own will be something in the region of £550-600. The viewfinder, about £130; the microphone, about £90-100; the Alpha lens adaptor, about £150; the wide lens converter about £100 and the fisheye converter about £20 more; the Accessory kit that I said was good value about £80, and it is good value because the battery on its own is about £65.
    We are anticipating about a month from now for shipping, early to mid June. The only kit which will be slightly behind will be the NEX-5 with 18-200mm, which will be a little bit later, about a month after that we will also be announcing the 3D firmware upgrade. All of the accessories will be available from day 1. In the UK, you will see those cameras hit the stores first in the photo independents, and that includes Jessops. We will be doing various launch activities around the UK with the retailers, a party atmosphere.
    Q: is focus confirmation offered with Alpha lenses on the adaptor?
    A: No. Since we reduced the flange back between the rear element and the sensor, we are experiencing some difficulties with the focus confirmation, which is why we have not made in autofocus. Autofocus varies massively according to the lens we are using, and therefore the autofocus indicator is not good enough to rely on.
    Q: Is there any way that this adaptor can power the OS or VC available in Tamron or Sigma lenses?
    A: No.
    Q: Is it an SSM type motor or an SAM type motor?
    A: It’s SSM. It is silent for both zoom and focusing and you should not hear any audible mechanics working on movie recordings. The microphones are positioned on the top of the camera body and they are separated by about a centimetre, it varies on the two bodies. Movie recording is not impeded by noises coming from the body.
    Q: Is the aperture actuated by a linear motor or another mechanism?
    A: Pass!
    Q: Is there a 3.5mm jack socket for other mics?
    A: No, it has to be the Sony mic.(In a later written reply to Photoclubalpha, Paul Genge stated that if Sony felt there was a viable market demand for a jack input adaptor which could be profitable, they would make it, but they were not here to serve niche markets).
    Q: About the mechanical shutter, is there a silent mode of any kind?
    A: No.
    Paul confirmed electronic pass-through of A-mount to the E-mount, everything about the lens data is transmitted. It knows EXIF data, where to position the aperture. For launch on these cameras AF is disabled.
    Q: Are there any plans for an electronic viewfinder?
    A: We have requested it, certainly most countries have requested it. It is something we would like to see. There is a multi-connector accessory shoe in the top of the camera that can do all sorts of wonderful things. Whether an electronic viewfinder is one of these, we don’t know. We certainly have seen nothing in development. We have seen it in other people’s products and we would like it too.
    Q: Are we likely to see video recording in a DSLR?
    A: Yes you are. When we announced NEX at PMA we also showed the next generations of Alpha. Video is in the next generation of products which we have already shown as prototypes.
    Q: Are there any more lenses planned for the system?
    A: The three-lens line up at the moment is a little bit restricting, and there’s potential for many more. Consumer feedback will determine it; ‘what they would like as lenses, we really want to hear’.
    Q: What are you calling this type of camera?
    A: Compact Interchangeable Lens Camera (later on, a questionnaire was handed to delegates to find the most popular term – in fact ‘Compact System Camera’ was the preferred choice).
    Q: Will the 3D panorama play back on other makes of TV?
    A: 3D playback – we guarantee the performance on Bravia, it should work on Samsung and some other 3D televisions, but we can not guarantee it.

  • Sony NEX generation launched


    SPLIT, Croatia, breakfast over – Sony Europe presents the new NEX-3 and NEX-5 mirrorless, HD video capable slim interchangeable lens APS-C digital cameras. This has been a launch anticipated by almost complete and accurate leaking of the specifications of the two cameras. Sony UK also provided advance information to all dealers, including pricing, before the press launch – allowing retail websites to have full data up and running as from May 11th.

    Toru Katsumoto presents his team’s latest offering (he holds a silver NEX-3)
    The entire system with accessories is to be available in June at once, no waiting for anything except the 18-200mm lens which will arrive a month later. Edit: the brochure says ‘October’ for the 18-200mm, at the presentation it was said that it would follow in a month or so. October is four months or so.
    (more…)